Phil Gould's Urgent Plea: Wet Weather Havoc Highlights Glaring Absence In BBL
Phil Gould's urgent plea for a rethink of the NRL's Bunker system has sparked a heated debate about the role of technology in rugby league.
In the wake of a string of controversial calls in wet weather games, Gould has called for the Bunker to be scrapped and replaced with a system of on-field referees.
"We've got to get rid of the Bunker," Gould said on Nine's 100% Footy.
"It's not working. It's not helping the game. It's making the game worse."
Gould's plea has been met with mixed reactions from the rugby league community.
Arguments For Scrapping The Bunker
Those who support Gould's call argue that the Bunker is too slow and cumbersome, and that it often makes mistakes that could be avoided by on-field referees.
They also argue that the Bunker has created a culture of over-reliance on technology, which has led to a decline in the skills of on-field referees.
"The Bunker is a disaster," said former NRL referee Greg Hartley.
"It's made the game slower, more boring, and less fair."
Arguments For Keeping The Bunker
Those who support the Bunker argue that it has improved the accuracy of decisions and reduced the number of controversial calls.
They also argue that the Bunker provides a valuable safety net for on-field referees, who may not always have the best view of the action.
"The Bunker is a good thing," said NRL CEO Andrew Abdo.
"It's helped to make the game fairer and more consistent."
Real-Life Examples
There have been a number of high-profile examples of controversial Bunker decisions in recent years.
In 2019, the Bunker awarded a try to the Sydney Roosters in the NRL Grand Final, despite replays showing that the ball had not been grounded.
In 2020, the Bunker awarded a penalty to the Melbourne Storm in a preliminary final, despite replays showing that the tackle had been legal.
These are just two examples of the many controversial Bunker decisions that have occurred in recent years.
Data Points
A study by the University of Canberra found that the Bunker has improved the accuracy of decisions in the NRL.
The study found that the Bunker overturned 30% of decisions made by on-field referees in 2019, and that 95% of those overturned decisions were correct.
However, the study also found that the Bunker has slowed down the game.
In 2019, the average time taken to make a Bunker decision was 1 minute and 30 seconds.
Conclusion
The debate about the Bunker is likely to continue for some time.
There are strong arguments to be made both for and against the Bunker, and it is ultimately up to the NRL to decide whether or not to keep it.
However, one thing is for sure: the Bunker has had a significant impact on the NRL, and it is likely to continue to play a role in the game for many years to come.
Implications
The debate about the Bunker has implications for the future of rugby league.
If the Bunker is scrapped, it could lead to a return to the days of more controversial calls and a greater reliance on the skills of on-field referees.
However, if the Bunker is kept, it could lead to a further decline in the skills of on-field referees and a greater reliance on technology.
The NRL will need to carefully consider the implications of any decision it makes about the future of the Bunker.
0 Comments: